Description: White marble panels
Text: Inscribed on the face of the panels. Bay II, Dado, Column 3 (lines 0-24) and Bay III, Upper register, left, (25 ff.)
Letters: Measurements?
Date: 301 CE (internal date)
Findspot: Aphrodisias:
Basilica area
Original location: Basilica façade,
Bay II and Bay III
Last recorded location: Museum
Interpretive
Edict Chapter 7
[de mercedibus operarior<u>m et ar]ṭificum
[operario rustico pasto]{s} diurni (denariis) uig[inti quinque]
[lapidario structori pasto diurni] (denariis) quinquagin[ta]
[fabro intestinario ut supra diurni (denariis) quinqua]gint[a]
[---]
5[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
10[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
15[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
20[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
de ae[ramento]
25ae[rario in orichalco mercedis in pondus(us) unum (denariis) octo]
in [cupri in pondus(us) unum (denariis) sex]
[---]
[---]
[---]
30[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
35[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
40[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
45[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
50[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
55[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
60[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
65[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
70[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
75[---]
[---]
[---]
(Chapter 8 followed below, and is lost.)
Diplomatic
Edict Chapter 7
[...........................].IFICUM
[....................]SDIURNI 𐆖 UIG[...........]
[.............................] 𐆖 QUINQUAGIN[..]
[.....................................]GINT[.]
[---]
5[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
10[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
15[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
20[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
DEAE[.......]
25AE[........................................]
IN[....................]
[---]
[---]
[---]
30[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
35[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
40[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
45[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
50[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
55[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
60[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
65[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
70[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
[---]
75[---]
[---]
[---]
(Chapter 8 followed below, and is lost.)
Apparatus
7.1: MHC 2023, p. 47 prints operario rustico p[ast]<o> diurni, which really stands for … p[ast]{s}<o>, and notes in his apparatus
(p. 48) ‘Aphrodisias appears to read [pasti]s clearly. Cf. JMR (ALA1989, 231, p. 274, ch. VIII, 1a), who restored whole line
in plural [operariis rusticis pasti]s diurni, atonicea. Though MHC is not entirely consistent in mimicking layout elsewhere
as he gives 7.18 on a single line, whereas it occupied two elsewhere. In sections that are lost at Aphrodisias should we simply
indicate entry numbers not (hypothetical) line numbers? And, where we do retain subsequent lines for long wrapped entries,
should we number them?
Bibliography
Recorded: New York University expedition 70.273
Publication: CIL 2208-2209 (parts); Erim and Reynolds, 1970 ; Erim and Reynolds, 1973 ; Reynolds, 1989 231, whence PHI Aphrodisias 77; Crawford, 2023 Chapter 3